|
The leadership council will be made up of Dookeran, Panday, deputy
political leaders Kamla Persad-Bissessar and Jack Warner and former
Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj
The UNC source said Panday wants to come back as leader of the party.
He is hoping that if he wins his appeal against his jail term and
is cleared of the bribery charges, the membership would want him
back at the helm.
“That is why Panday is suggesting a leadership council made
up of himself but if he loses his cases, he would then want to select
another leader from the council and Dookeran would be left out,”
a source said.
In their talks, Panday reportedly told Dookeran there are people
within the two factions of the party who do not want unity.
After leadership council talks failed, Panday reportedly suggested
that he and Dookeran come together with a new team and leave out
the trouble-makers in the party and those who are against unity.
Some UNC officials in the Dookeran camp are wondering whether Panday
was referring to Persad-Bissessar, Warner and Maharaj as the trouble-makers
in the UNC.
“Panday is such a shrewd politician and he is trying his best
to frustrate Dookeran with all kinds of ludicrous suggestions for
him to get fed-up and leave the party,” another source said.
Sources say that the unity talks on Wednesday, which may be final,
did not reach any conclusion.
It would now seem that the executive will be going ahead with its
no-confidence motion next Saturday, since UNC deputy political leader
Wade Mark has been urging financial members of the party to come
out on August l9 for the National Congress.
Only financial members can sanction the vote of no-confidence against
Dookeran, giving the executive the green light to expel him.
“They are going to pack the Rienzi Complex (which holds about
2,000 people) with supporters and say the crowd was about 15,000,”
one observer noted.
However, the Dookeran camp is arguing that any move to remove Dookeran
must be done by 75 per cent of the membership according to the UNC
constitution.
“They would have to bring more than 20,000 financial members
to take that decision,” one UNC MP said. |