|
Give Holder’s Doctorate to Lara
|
| By
LESTER ORIE |
| THE
many of us who followed the career of Geoffrey Holder did so because
we took a proprietary pride in his achievements, believing that
he was truly one of us.
Thus, when he took on 007 in Live and Let Die, we almost didn’t
mind if Bond did not triumph over the villainous Holder; and when
we heard that Holder visited the White House at the personal invitation
of the President of the United States, we walked on cloud nine in
a vicarious celebration of that momentous occasion.
Moments like that made us proud to share the same birthplace with
Holder.
But we were wrong about Holder.
All of us.
He is not one of us.
Trinis are a happy-go-lucky people; we have an easy, spontaneous
laugh, and an easy way about us.
|

GEOFFREY
HOLDER

BRIAN
LARA
|
When we guffaw, we could make the gods smile and laugh with
us.
It is probably why we believe God is a Trini.
When, however, Holder guffaws (as he did in the Bond movie) it
is not with that same sense of innocence of a true Trini, who
is just tickled pink over some sidewalk inanity, but as in the
movie, it is something diabolic.
All skin teeth are not all grin teeth seems so true in his case.
For now, which one of us who having read his interview in the
Express with BC Pires could ever again wish to be identified with
him?
It has been said that it is simple to be great; it has also been
said that it is greater to be simple.
Holder obviously missed the second part of that profound observation.
Pires often comes across in his writing with a superior air, but
I tell you in this instance he near made sainthood, just by remaining
civil and keeping his patience.
Having read what transpired in that interview, Pires would easily
have benefitted from that part of the law that deals with extenuating
and mitigating circumstances, if he had chosen to lose his temper.
For, honestly, while he was wondering if the great one would have
cracked him with his cane, one felt it would have been a more
just outcome if he (Pires) had lost his cool, snatched away the
cane and in 007 style cracked his nemesis a few, sending him scattering
like dust in the wind.
In all my years of reading I have never come across someone who
evoked such unprovoked obnoxiousness as Holder did in that interview.
When he might have smiled (condescendingly even), he chose instead
to bare his fangs like Dracula; he snarled and growled at the
simplest questions that required the simplest, straightforward
answers.
It must be concluded that Holder is obviously too superior, god-like,
to treat with any courtesy or decency a local journalist, from
a local newspaper.
One wonders though, if he treats with the same disdain, scorn,
that he treated BC, journalists from, say, the New York Times
or Newsweek etc.?
When we come across as some kind of medieval ogre as Holder did,
then more than ever one realises how blessed we are to have in
our midst a statesman and gentleman like Derek Walcott, who is
St. Lucian-born but acknowledges TnT as his home.
Could anyone imagine the Noble Prize winning poet displaying such
crassness, such ugliness, in any situation?
And as we mention the great poet, it is obvious that Holder hates
to hear even the name Derek Walcott.
One suspects that if BC had repeated Walcott’s name just
one more time his worst fears would have come to pass.
We would have been reading of him posthumously.
The truth is, Walcott’s greatness allows him the extravagance
to make a fire hydrant or hubcap out of beings like Holder.
The other truth is he is just too much of a gentleman to reduce
himself to such a Neanderthal act ... even if the occasion demands
it.
And as for VS Naipaul, whose name also came up, he would likely
refuse on the grounds that it would be the waste of a good thing.
Nothing provides us with a better contrast than that which exists
between men and monsters than the record breaking performance
of one Brian Lara.
Lara showed his greatness, his class, not only on the field of
play, but afterwards, after the game, with everybody gushing about
how well he handled the post match interviews; how gracious and
gentlemanly; in short, how Trini to the bone he was.
And, indeed, achievement really has nothing to do with greatness,
unless it shines with the aura of humility and plain decency,
and all those other noble qualities we look for in our exemplars,
in our icons.
The irony of it all is that Holder was here to receive from us
an honourary doctorate for his achievements.
I wonder if those responsible for the conferring of the doctorate
on him are still pleased with that choice, after reading the interview
with him.
Question to them: With the illumination of hindsight, would we
call that a good choice, and would we do it all over again, if
we had to?
The great ones are never those whose hearts are made of stone,
but rather those we describe as having hearts of gold; and from
whose mouth issue forth milk and honey. Not bee stings and serpentine
venom.
The verdict: UWI, take back the honourary degree that you conferred
on Geoffrey Holder and give it to one of us i.e. give it to Brian
Lara.
He is the one who embodies all the criteria of true greatness.
Ask BC.
|
|