THE EDITOR:
OVER the years, I have read with detached amusement, Kevin
Baldeosingh’s (he of the “naturally” curly hair)
efforts to disprove the existence of God and his scorn of anyone
who differs with his perspective.
Two of his recent efforts, however, have caused me greater concern.
First, Kevin ridiculed the successful “A’Level”
and “Cape” students who publicly thanked God for their
successes. He also expressed his “horror” that these
students will be the leaders of tomorrow and that their belief in
God will cause them to make decisions that are not rational.
I hope that God grants Baldeosingh a long life to see these same
students become outstanding and God-fearing leaders of our future.
Second, on October 7, 2005, Baldeosingh in his Newsday article “Good
Thoughts” put forward an argument in support of abortion that
was so flawed in its rationality that he seemed to have outsmarted
even himself.
He stated that “for a body to have rights, it must belong
to a person. The foetus may be human, biologically speaking, but
it is not a person.
“A person is a member of a social group, and only a person
can have rights.”
My Pocket Oxford Dictionary states that, interalia, a person is
an “individual human” or “one’s body or
bodily presence”.
Does a foetus have a body?
If not, what does it have?
Baldeosingh further states that:
“… to even begin to have … rights, a person must
develop consciousness.
“The foetus, however, does not show brainwave patterns that
reflect consciousness of any sort until after 30 weeks of development
-- well into the seventh month.
“Ergo, abortions before that cannot be truthfully called murder,
and virtually no abortions are performed after the second trimester.”
I would refer Baldeosingh to a wonderful documentary made in 2005
by the National Geographic Society called “In The Womb”.
This documentary, using medical and computer technology, chronicled
the growth and development of a foetus from conception to birth.
It clearly shows the ability of the foetus to feel pain long before
the seventh month.
I am not a biologist or psychologist of any sort, but logic dictates
that for an individual to experience pain there must be some sort
of consciousness.
We seem to have fallen into the trap of playing semantics with words.
The same dictionary defines the following:
Pregnant – “with child”.
Abortion – “expulsion of foetus from uterus during first
28 weeks of pregnancy, either spontaneous or induced”.
Foetus – “developed embryo in womb or egg”.
Embryo – “unborn or unhatched offspring”.
Foeticide – “killing of the foetus”.
Abortion can only happen after foeticide.
It is time for us to stop trying to play smart with foolishness!
Baldeosingh even admits that the foetus may be human!
I assume that the foetus may be human and alive.
Therefore, when you take the life of a human foetus, anytime after
conception, have you committed murder?
When you are killing it, does the foetus feel pain?
Do we have any awareness or remembrance of our consciousness within
the womb?
If we don’t, is it that we never had it?
Maybe Baldeosingh can enlighten me. |