| Mirror
Mail |
| |
Local businesses
strangling Christian projects
What freedom of association and assembly?
Panday is still my leader |
| |
| Local
businesses strangling Christian projects |
| MAUREEN
SAMUEL, Co-ordinating Secretary, CURE. |
THE EDITOR:
IS there some sort of a conspiracy by the local business community
to frustrate and strangle Christian oriented projects?
I ask this question in light of my observation and experience over
the past two years or so.
As the Co-ordinating Secretary for the Community Unification and
Reformation Exercises (CURE) group I have, over the period sent
out hundreds of letters to most of corporate Trinidad and Tobago,
inviting participation and sponsorship for a number of projects.
With the exception of four or five, every other firm has refused
to even respond.
Of the few that did, invariably their replies were that their budgetary
allocations were exhausted.
From this response, my group began to send our applications/proposals
out, in some instances, more than a year in advance.
This was to ensure that our requests were with the businesses before
the start of their financial year.
Still, very little changed.
Most are yet to respond and the few who have are “unable to
assist at this time.”
It should be pointed-out that the types of events in question are
quite similar (sometimes even superior) to those that receive an
obscene amount of funding from many of these same companies.
Other Christian even organisers have expressed similar experiences.
We have written to state fuelled companies such as TSTT, Flour Mills,
FCB and the Unit Trust.
These together with Nestle, Dairy Dairy, CLICO, Western Union and
Coca Cola, are among the leaders in sponsorship of sport and cultural
events.
Nevertheless, although these and hundreds of others have been contacted,
not one dollar of sponsorship money has been committed to any of
these projects.
During that time several almost identical secular programmes especially
by individual promoters have come on stream and received support,
while we are yet to receive even an acknowledgement.
This situation is so widespread and so prevalent that it is difficult
to accept it as mere coincidence.
One only has to check the newspapers or the electronic media to
get the overwhelming and compelling evidence.
The costs of advertisements for secular shows are underwritten by
members of corporate TnT while church oriented events are unsponsored.
Does this look like accident or is it by design? |
| Back
To Top |
| |
| What
freedom of association and assembly? |
| DOODNATH
MAHARAJ. |
THE EDITOR:
IN a Newsday article dated July 2, 2006, Page 3, the caption
was “I saw Panday in CJ’s lobby.”
So what!
Give that there is an ongoing legal problem between the Chief Justice
(CJ), the Chief Magistrate Sherman Mc Nichols and Basdeo Panday,
what law prevents Panday from visiting the Chief Justice, purely
on humanitarian or altruistic grounds.
The constitution of TnT, in it’s enshrined rights and freedoms,
states that a citizen has the right to freedom of association and
assembly.
This nonsensical argument has been pervading the masses for years,
as though no one would one day question the validity of the law.
So, if, for the sake of argument, the CJ’s son is in love
with Panday’s daughter, and there is a legal matter between
both men, should the legal system prevent both parties from accommodation?
Utter nonsense!
Accordingly, Danny Montano (PNM) should not be seen speaking to
his brother Robin Montano (UNC), a perfect case for Constitional
Reform.
According to the article, it appears that an atrocious crime has
been committed, because two people were exercising their rights.
Be it know that, at the ground level, supporters of both parties
live, love and cry together, so who the hell are you.
A typical form of discrimination between the rich, poor and the
political.
The Maha Sabha controversy, dealing with the radio license in a
case in point.
Louis Lee Sing, a PNM cohort, gets anything he wants.
According to the media reports, Chinese and half Chinese seems to
be the people who have the most brains and they are offered the
most lucrative jobs, both private and government.
Africans and Indians control this country and we ask the question
that whether, we cannot find competent Black people to do the jobs.
Next is the case of the CCJ, which, if the Maha Sabha case had been
brought to them, the question is, “Would justice have been
served?”
As it is at present in TnT we do not need the CCJ, similar to the
FTAA.
We are definitely not mature enough to handle these situations.
|
| Back
To Top |
| |
| Panday
is still my leader |
| CONCERNED. |
THE EDITOR:
I WOULD like to comment on three extremely crucial aspects,
concerning the lives of the general population of TnT.
They include: (1) The UNC turmoil (2) The Draft Constitution and
(3) The issue of the Chief Justice (CJ).
On the first count, Panday must understand that giving Dookeran
extra time is making him stronger and we may have to end up with
penalty kicks, so what has to be done is to call a public forum
immediately at Aranguez, and make a final decision.
The question is, “Which seat in TnT can Dookeran win, without
the patronage of Panday?”
The Organisation for National Reconstruction (ONR) won more votes,
but not a seat, the People’s National Movement (PNM) is the
government, but the Opposition received 20,000 more votes and they
talk about democracy, right Robinson.
Panday, you may have some shackles around your neck, but you are
my leader and this is where we come to the constitution.
Two Draft Constitutions have been presented by the Principles of
Fairness and the former President Ellis Clarke.
Where was the consultation by the people?
Do you know that we, the people want (1) A specific date for general
election and not a back pocket date. (2) A constitution written
in English and not legalese. (3) We need proportional representation,
where every vote is considered, this is the epitome of democracy.
The world cabal has surfaced, but in reality the cabal is the principles
of fairness, behaving like the Jews in America. This cannot work.
On the issue of the Chief Justice, my contribution is simply, “What
do you mean by charging the CJ for attempting to pervert the course
of justice.”
This is like charging a person for attempted suicide, when suicide
is death, and the person is still alive.
Would you like to ponder what would have happened if this case had
gone to the Caribbean Court of Justice. |
| Back
To Top |
|