tntnews.net
Go Back Send us your Feedback Browse our Archives Friday Mirror Headlines
  Sunday Mirror Headlines

 

Mark: No trust in AG
... accuses Montano of bribing judges

By Bibi Khan
TEMPERS flared on Tuesday as Senator Wade Mark brought up the name Dhansam Dhansook in the International Criminal Court debate.

It caused the sitting to be adjourned by 20 minutes after Leader of Government Business Dr. Lenny Saith asked for a break.

Government Senator Danny Montano, who had initially presented the International Criminal Court legislation for a second reading, was berated by Mark who said: “It has taken him 15 minutes to present a bulky and extreme piece of legislation that probably was not read or absorbed by them on the other side.”

The Bill, which provides for punishment for and prevention of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, and which gives the Attorney General full privilege to prosecute, did not sit well with Mark as he called it “offensive, draconian and sometimes bordering on unconstitutional”.

WADE MARK

WADE MARK

JOHN JEREMIE

JOHN JEREMIE


He said the Opposition United National Congress (UNC) was not against the concept or establishment of the Bill but was concern-ed about how it would be implemented.

“The Attorney General has enormous powers and these powers are given to a politician, and not even an elected one. These powers are too great and enormous.”

He questioned why the role of the Director Public Prosecutions in section 90 of the Constitution was being ignored.

“The illustrious Attorney General (AG) is someone who we just do not trust.

“Too much powers are being granted to him.”

AG John Jeremie looked calm throughout Mark’s tirade.

Mark labelled him “Mr. Political Fix It”, which brought President Linda Baboolal to her feet, telling Mark “not to go too far”.

But a rebellious Mark replied that it was what town was calling Jeremie. She again warned him and he in turn warned the ruling party that “the Bill will come back to haunt you”.

He said the PNM and its ministers might one day end up before the International Court for certain crimes.

He clashed with Montano over the sale of a Toyota Royal Saloon car that ended up in the hands of now deceased drug lord Nankissoon Boodram, also known as Dole Chadee.

Montano said Mark was being irrelevant and while President Baboolal agreed, Mark asked: “How can I be irrelevant when I am dealing with ‘retrospectivity’?”

He accused Montano of trying to silence the Opposition.

“You are here to fix your face.

“We are here to remove you.

“We are paid by the taxpayers to expose the government.

“What they believe; that we must come here to be peewats?”

Mark called for “total silence” whenever he rose to speak to which most of the senators had a hearty laugh.

He continued his charade and referred to an Express article dated May 8, 2005.

But an annoyed Montano jumped to his feet once again to protest that the article had nothing to do with the Bill and raised a motion for Mark not to be heard.

But as soon as President Baboolal was about to put the motion to the House, Government Business Leader Dr. Lenny Saith suggested that there should be a five-minute recess.

She agreed and told the sitting that the House was on recess. Mark, still perturbed by Montano’s protestations, said: “You want to silence me!

“What wrong with this man?

“You are bribing judges, and you want to silence me!”

But the five-minute break turned into 20 minutes as Baboolal met with the three bench leaders who included Saith, Mark and Independent Senator Eastlyn McKenzie who agreed that Mark should continue with his contribution.

His criticism, though, was aimed at the AG whom he said was a politician and should not “dangle” in the court of justice.

He said the only person who should have that power is the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Mark called for a Joint Select Committee to be set up to scrutinise the Bill, since he did not want it to be undemocratic and draconian.

Attorney General John Jeremie, however, said that the office of Chief Prosecutor arose out of fear of domestic driven prosecution and that whenever international law comes it is the Attorney General that has the power.

“I hope that my little friend here is listening, but of course he is not.

“Senator Mark is ignoring me.

“When you are dealing with international criminal matters the DPP is not contacted but someone who can be held accountable.”

Independent Senator Ramesh Deosaran said the Bill was the most remarkable document he has seen within the last 15 years and recalled instances of genocide in countries.

He called it a “sophisticated law” and referred to Articles 103 to 106, which dealt with the role of states in enforcement of sentences of imprisonment.

“We have a death penalty here, but in the ICC there is no such thing.

“Are we going to abolish it or let it cause an embarrassment to us in our book?”
___________________________________________________________________________________
Archives | Feedback | Friday Mirror Home | Sunday Mirror Home | Go Back
© 2001 TnTNews.net